This piece is such a great reminder that value often hides in plain sight. The way you unpacked meeting transcripts as living assets rather than dusty archives really stayed with me.
In my own work teaching AI and cybersecurity, I’ve started reframing internal data flows not just as records to protect, but as trust-building tools that can actively shape security culture. Your emphasis on transparency and empowering teams helped me see how these "unseen" layers can become strategic anchors rather than liabilities.
Thank you for putting this into such clear, encouraging language. I’d enjoy exchanging thoughts on how these insights can strengthen both human decision-making and technical governance, it feels like an area where we could learn a lot from each other.
@Benta Kamau I’d like that! The cybersecurity perspective is something that I hadn’t even considered. It’s interesting how the same document can be viewed as both a liability and an asset. Both are great perspectives to have and balance the other out.
I’m really impressed by how these ready-to-use prompts unlock quality insights across so many angles: sales, product, team health, even strategic gaps. It looks like there are a lot of useful insights buried in transcripts, if we know how to tap into them.
I’ve definitely been guilty of this too. It’s way more fun to tinker with no-code builders and complex automations.
Mining transcripts? Not so much. But the truth is, those “boring” steps are often more than enough to get something valuable off the ground. We might already be sitting on our next big idea and not even realize it.
This is SO good! The part about having more AI note-takers than humans in meetings literally made me laugh because it's so accurate 😅
I've been saying this forever - we're all obsessed with capturing everything but terrible at actually USING what we capture. Like, your meeting transcripts are basically free market research sitting in your inbox and most people just... ignore them? Wild.
The "context that gets lost" thing is chef's kiss - I see this constantly with my clients. Sales gets all the juicy emotional stuff about why someone really wants to buy, but then implementation gets handed a boring bullet point list. No wonder things go sideways!
Definitely stealing a few of these prompts for my own workflow. The churn risk one especially - such a simple question but probably catches signals we miss all the time. Love that you made it actionable instead of just theoretical ✨
Exactly. We’re drowning in info and doing nothing with it.
You nailed it... these transcripts are basically free customer research, and most teams just let it rot in their inboxes. It's like having a map to buried treasure and never bothering to dig.
Please, steal away! I'm glad the churn risk one hit. It's always the simple questions that surface the real stuff.
This is 🔥, Tam. Way too many teams are sitting on a goldmine of unmined transcripts while chasing “net new” data. Loved how you broke it down into actual categories.
This piece is such a great reminder that value often hides in plain sight. The way you unpacked meeting transcripts as living assets rather than dusty archives really stayed with me.
In my own work teaching AI and cybersecurity, I’ve started reframing internal data flows not just as records to protect, but as trust-building tools that can actively shape security culture. Your emphasis on transparency and empowering teams helped me see how these "unseen" layers can become strategic anchors rather than liabilities.
Thank you for putting this into such clear, encouraging language. I’d enjoy exchanging thoughts on how these insights can strengthen both human decision-making and technical governance, it feels like an area where we could learn a lot from each other.
@Benta Kamau I’d like that! The cybersecurity perspective is something that I hadn’t even considered. It’s interesting how the same document can be viewed as both a liability and an asset. Both are great perspectives to have and balance the other out.
I’m really impressed by how these ready-to-use prompts unlock quality insights across so many angles: sales, product, team health, even strategic gaps. It looks like there are a lot of useful insights buried in transcripts, if we know how to tap into them.
This really feels like a wake-up call, we’re sitting on so much data we ignore, yet still feel lost and keep chasing new inputs.
It’s time to turn specific meetings into dedicated metrics. That way, we can actually track what matters and stop drowning in noise.
I’ve definitely been guilty of this too. It’s way more fun to tinker with no-code builders and complex automations.
Mining transcripts? Not so much. But the truth is, those “boring” steps are often more than enough to get something valuable off the ground. We might already be sitting on our next big idea and not even realize it.
So true to "We might already be sitting on our next big idea and not even realize it."!
This is SO good! The part about having more AI note-takers than humans in meetings literally made me laugh because it's so accurate 😅
I've been saying this forever - we're all obsessed with capturing everything but terrible at actually USING what we capture. Like, your meeting transcripts are basically free market research sitting in your inbox and most people just... ignore them? Wild.
The "context that gets lost" thing is chef's kiss - I see this constantly with my clients. Sales gets all the juicy emotional stuff about why someone really wants to buy, but then implementation gets handed a boring bullet point list. No wonder things go sideways!
Definitely stealing a few of these prompts for my own workflow. The churn risk one especially - such a simple question but probably catches signals we miss all the time. Love that you made it actionable instead of just theoretical ✨
Exactly. We’re drowning in info and doing nothing with it.
You nailed it... these transcripts are basically free customer research, and most teams just let it rot in their inboxes. It's like having a map to buried treasure and never bothering to dig.
Please, steal away! I'm glad the churn risk one hit. It's always the simple questions that surface the real stuff.
This is 🔥, Tam. Way too many teams are sitting on a goldmine of unmined transcripts while chasing “net new” data. Loved how you broke it down into actual categories.
Thank you, Daria. Right? So much untapped insight just sitting in meeting notes and call transcripts while everyone’s chasing the next shiny thing.
Organizing them into categories helps me wrap my head around customGPT builds or similar that can be utilized across diff teams.